Skip to content
Platform Who it serves Current status Standards Funders & partners
Standards & safeguards

The discipline that makes a signal worth acting on.

A signal carries weight only because of the standards behind it. These principles govern how Climate Probity moves from a record to a reviewed conclusion. They are design commitments for the production system.

Climate Probity analytical states

What the platform produces, named precisely.

Climate Probity works at these three states and matches the language of any output to the state the evidence actually reaches.

01

Indicator

An observation in the records that may or may not be significant.

02

Review question

An indicator that merits clarification or further examination.

03

Analytical finding

A conclusion supported by the documented evidence, with its scope and limitations stated.

Categories Climate Probity does not determine

Where authority rests with others.

Allegation

A claim of wrongdoing that has not necessarily been established. It belongs to those with standing to make it.

Formal determination

A conclusion reached by an authorized investigative, judicial, administrative, or oversight body.

Safeguards

Built into the workflow, not added afterward.

Source traceability

Every signal links to identifiable source records. A reader can follow it back.

Human review

A qualified person assesses significance and sufficiency before anything carries weight.

Proportionality

The language of an output is matched to the strength of the evidence behind it.

Right of reply

Subjects can respond before publication, and the response travels with the output.

Correction & version control

When new information changes a conclusion, the output is corrected and the change is recorded.

Independence

Governance is designed so that no funder, subject, or partner can shape a conclusion.

Policies in development

The governance and method policies the production system will publish.

These policies set out how the platform is operated and governed. They describe controls and accountability, without disclosing proprietary analytical methods.

Conflicts of interest
Reviewer qualifications
Source reliability
Privacy and personal data
Information security
Retention and deletion
Complaints and appeals
Method validation
Bias and error monitoring
Governance arrangements
The disclosure boundary

Open about principles, careful about methods.

We describe how a signal is reviewed, traced, and governed, because that is what makes it credible. We do not describe how it is produced, because that is what makes the platform defensible and would assist replication.

We explain
  • Source traceability and evidential states
  • Human review and proportionality
  • Right of reply, correction, independence
  • Current development status
We do not expose
  • Detection logic, scoring, or thresholds
  • Entity-resolution and confidence methods
  • Source-processing and ingestion design
  • Proprietary taxonomies and corpus detail
{{ footer }}
Get in touch

Request a briefing

Thank you. Your request has been received.

We will review your message and respond using the email address provided.

Tell us briefly about your organization and what you would like to discuss. Your request will be sent securely to the Climate Probity team.

We could not send your request.Please try again or contact hello@climateprobity.com.
{{ err.name }}
{{ err.org }}
{{ err.email }}
{{ err.msg }}

Your details are submitted to the Climate Probity team. Prototype submissions are not stored.