Connecting climate finance records for more informed decisions.
Climate Probity brings together official disclosures, project and procurement records, entity data, and credible public-source information that currently sit across separate systems.
It helps institutions identify matters that may warrant further review, understand why they have been surfaced, and trace each signal to the underlying evidence.
Analysis helps direct attention. Qualified experts determine what the evidence supports.
More climate finance information is available. Making it connected and decision-useful remains difficult.
Climate finance moves through a growing network of funds, intermediaries, implementing entities, and counterparties. Much of the underlying information is publicly available, but it is distributed across institutions, formats, and reporting cycles.
A project disclosure may reveal little about related procurement activity, entity histories, audit findings, or developments recorded elsewhere. The challenge is no longer access alone. It is connecting the record so that relevant relationships and patterns can be understood.
Climate Probity is designed to complement existing transparency, screening, assurance, and accountability mechanisms. It connects portfolio-level signals to source records, expert review, and proportionate institutional or public outputs.
Three roles, one chain of evidence.
Each role serves a different purpose. All three rely on the same discipline: a signal is only as useful as the source it traces to and the review it has passed.
Make public-interest conclusions traceable and testable.
Public outputs present the conclusion, its source basis, its limits, the response received, and the correction history together, so a reader can judge it on the evidence.
Help institutions focus review where it is most useful.
Portfolio, project, and counterparty views help institutions decide where to direct assurance, supervision, and due-diligence questions first.
Keep consequential judgments under qualified human control.
Evidence sufficiency, proportionality, conflicts, right of reply, peer review, and version control are treated as conditions of publication, not afterthoughts.
Illustrative views of a source-linked workflow.
These synthetic examples show how a user can move from a portfolio-level signal to the project, review question, and source record behind it. They illustrate the intended output and review workflow. Proprietary detection and entity-resolution methods are not disclosed.
Built first for the institutions that act on the evidence.
Three groups of institutional users shape the platform. Public-interest outputs extend its value to a wider set of users and beneficiaries.
Public-interest outputs are intended to support researchers, journalists, civil society, and communities affected by climate-financed activities. These are primary beneficiaries of the transparency mission, distinct from the institutional decision-support users above.
See who it serves →A conclusion is only as good as the discipline behind it.
Climate Probity keeps the steps of judgment distinct, and matches the language of any output to the evidence behind it. These commitments guide how the platform is designed and operated.
A proof of concept moving toward production.
The materials on this site demonstrate a product model and selected workflows. They should not be read as evidence that a full platform or monitoring operation is already running.
See the full status note →Help move a working model into independent infrastructure.
Founding support would build the data, engineering, review, and governance capacity the platform needs to operate credibly, with independence designed into how the outputs are produced.
Support funds the capacity to do the work. It does not buy influence over findings, advance sign-off, or any claim of endorsement.